Comparison

Daylite vs cloud AI agent platforms

Most AI-governance and managed-agent tools document policy or run your agents in their cloud. Daylite does a different job. It enforces policy at the MCP tool-call boundary, in your own environment, and proves what the agent did with evidence an auditor can verify offline.

Anthropic Managed Agents is a fast cloud on-ramp for teams that can send data to a managed service. For finance, healthcare, and defense, where data cannot leave your environment and a mutable log will not survive an audit, here is how the two compare.

FeatureDaylite (VPC)Anthropic (Cloud)
Deployment modelSelf-hosted single Rust binary inside your VPCManaged cloud service on Anthropic infrastructure
Data residencyData never leaves your network. Any region, air-gapped OKProcessed on Anthropic infra, region availability varies
CryptographyFIPS 140-3 validated library (aws-lc-rs / AWS-LC); not product-certifiedAnthropic-managed, no public FIPS certification
Runtime enforcementGates each tool-call before it runs: secret scan, PII scan, classification ceiling, per-tool allow/deny/approveNot disclosed
Audit evidenceAppend-only SHA-256 hash-chain + HMAC signatures + legal hold, offline-verifiable (NIST AU-9/AU-10)Platform-level logging, Anthropic-managed, mutable
PII / PHI handlingScanner on the request path: regex + Luhn + aho-corasick, auto-redact before the LLMNo built-in PII redaction disclosed
Access controlSCIM 2.0 + OIDC SSO + mTLS + API keys + per-tenant classification ceilings + cell-based multi-tenancySCIM RBAC (Apr 9 launch), Workspace roles, SSO via Okta/Entra
ObservabilitySIEM connector (Splunk HEC, OCSF format), HMAC-signed webhooks with MITRE ATT&CK event typesOpenTelemetry export to Splunk/Datadog (Apr 9 Cowork Enterprise launch)
Standards alignmentNIST SP 800-53 control mapping (AU-9/AU-10, AC-3/AC-4), HIPAA, DORA Article 12, EU AI Act Annex VIII, OWASP Agentic Top 10SOC 2 Type II (Anthropic corporate), shared responsibility model
LLM providerAny LLM via OpenAI-compatible API + local inference (candle GGUF). Privacy-aware routing: PII detected = local onlyClaude models only. Bedrock option adds AWS FedRAMP High but still cloud-hosted
Secret managementPhantom Tokens: agents see UUIDs, real keys injected at proxy edge. Prevents credential exfiltration via prompt injectionAnthropic-managed credentials
PricingOne-time deploy, runs on your compute. No per-session fees. Scales with your infra, not your usage$0.08/session-hour (Managed Agents) + $40-100/seat/mo (Cowork Enterprise)
Network controlsRuns inside VPC, air-gapped support, SSRF protection on all outbound connectorsInternet-accessible SaaS. Bedrock PrivateLink available but Claude-only
Open standardsOpenAI /v1/chat, SCIM 2.0 (RFC 7644), OCSF for SIEM, OIDC, mTLS, MCP JSON-RPC 2.0Proprietary Messages API. No MCP enforcement layer

When to choose Anthropic

Your team wants a fully managed cloud experience, operates in unregulated or low-regulation environments, and is standardized on Claude models. Managed Agents gets you from zero to running agents in minutes.

When to choose Daylite

You need to gate each agent tool-call against policy before it runs, and prove what the agent did with evidence an auditor can verify offline. Your data has to stay inside your environment, possibly air-gapped. A mutable log will not survive your audit. You run in finance, healthcare, or defense, and you want enforcement at the tool-call boundary, not another policy document.

Back to DayliteSecurity architecture