Enterprise vendor questionnaires grew a new section in 2026. Agent inventory, action audit, model provenance, output monitoring, AI subprocessors. Your SOC 2 does not cover it. We write your answers for you, mapped to the standard reviewers use, and get you unstuck in a week.
Fixed price, delivered in 7 days. Full refund if it does not get you past the AI section.
You are buying finished answers, written from your actual stack, not a kit you fill in yourself. Three steps, about a week end to end.
A structured form about your models, agents, data flows, and tools. No code, no credentials. That is all we need from you.
Your answers, drafted from your intake and mapped to CSA AI-CAIQ, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001. Every honest gap comes back with a fix, not a blank.
The full document set, plus a 1:1 to walk your reviewer's exact questionnaire. If it does not get you past the AI section, you get a full refund.
Procurement teams bolted an AI module onto their standard vendor review this year. It asks questions your compliance platform has no answers for, because they are about your agents at runtime, not your policies on paper. Founders answer them one painful email thread at a time, and the deal waits. We watched it stall funded, SOC 2-certified teams for a month or more.
You fill a 30-minute intake about your stack. We deliver the pack within 7 days, written in the framework language reviewers map against.
Tailored answers for the CSA AI-CAIQ, the 320-question standard reviewers adopted in 2026, plus NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 mapping so the reviewer can check their boxes.
The one-pager every reviewer asks for first: models, agents, hosting, provenance, what touches customer data.
Template plus a worked example. Where data enters, what the agent can reach, where it can never go.
Training-use, retention, and subprocessor language for your counsel to review and attach.
What happens when an agent misbehaves, who gets told, and how fast. Reviewers want to see you thought about it.
When they say "prove it", this is the list of artifacts to show, in the order they ask.
The Live Evidence tier adds a drop-in sidecar to your stack. Every consequential agent action lands in a tamper-evident, hash-chained log, and your trust page shows chain-verified numbers your customer's security team can check themselves. Compliance platforms cannot offer this. They are not in your runtime path. We are.
A compliance consultant for this runs five figures. The Kit is a fixed price with a money-back guarantee.
Founding price. Rising after the first cohort.
Dmitrii Karataev. Twenty years running infrastructure and security for enterprises. Today I run AI governance inside a US consumer-finance company, where these documents face real reviewers and real regulators, not hypothetical ones. The kit is the pack I wish every AI vendor had handed me.
SOC 2 is why you got the questionnaire at all. The AI section is the part SOC 2 does not cover: agents, models, provenance, runtime behavior. That is what the kit answers.
Plenty of teams do, and reviewers have learned to spot it. Security teams now flag AI-drafted policy prose that describes controls the vendor does not have, and a caught hallucination stalls the review worse than a blank. The kit is different in kind: answers tied to your actual stack from the intake, and on the evidence tiers, backed by verifiable runtime records no chatbot can produce.
Done for you. You spend 30 minutes on the intake; we write the answers from your stack and deliver the finished pack. The only thing we hand you to edit is the DPA addendum, for your counsel to review.
No. It is engineering and security documentation. Have your counsel review the DPA addendum before you attach it.
A 30-minute intake form about your stack: models, hosting, data flows, tools your agents can call. No source code, no credentials.
Every order includes a 1:1 review call. Bring the actual questionnaire and we work through the gaps together. If it still does not clear the section, you get a full refund.