Ship GenAI past InfoSec in days,
not months.
Single Rust binary in your VPC. FIPS 140-3 crypto. Tamper-evident audit. Pre-configured for DORA, HIPAA, and EU AI Act.
Most enterprise GenAI pilots stall in InfoSec review. Not because the models are wrong. Because the compliance layer does not exist yet in your stack.
Daylite ships that layer. A single self-hosted Rust binary that redacts PII, sandboxes agent execution, and logs every tool call to a cryptographically verifiable hash chain. Your CISO signs off in one architecture call.
Integration is one line. Change your base_url to http://daylite.vpc:8080/v1. Zero egress. Air-gap ready.
Gartner projects that at least 30% of GenAI projects will be abandoned after proof of concept by the end of 2025. The cited reasons include inadequate risk controls and escalating compliance costs, not model performance.[1]
The European Commission Impact Assessment on the AI Act reports €29K internal plus €23K external audit, every year, per high-risk AI system.[2]
The compliance layer your stack is missing.
Three things every enterprise GenAI deployment needs before InfoSec will sign off. Daylite ships all three as a single binary you can drop into your VPC today.
Who actually needs this
Daylite targets regulated enterprises where standard SQL audit logs fail regulatory admissibility tests. These are the verticals with hard-dated forcing functions.
Build it yourself, or plug it in.
The compliance layer is not an optional nice-to-have. Your only decision is whether to staff it internally or transfer that liability to a vendor whose entire product is this one layer.
You make the choice every quarter you keep pushing the compliance layer down the backlog.
Integration is one line.
OpenAI-compatible proxy. Works with any framework that talks to /v1/chat/completions. LangChain, LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI, raw SDK. Change your base_url, nothing else.
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
# base_url="https://api.openai.com/v1" (before)
base_url="http://daylite.vpc:8080/v1", # after
api_key="sk-...",
)
Architecture
Memory-safe Rust binary. Built on FIPS-validated cryptography. Zero lateral movement. Runs where your infrastructure runs, not in our cloud.
60-day Paid Technology Evaluation, not a free trial
Regulated enterprises do not buy infrastructure from free trials. They buy from structured evaluations with defined success criteria that convert to annual license at closeout.
Evaluation from $25K. Annual licenses $60K to $800K.
60-day Paid Technology Evaluation ($25K-$50K) with defined deliverables and full conversion credit toward annual license. Annual tiers scale by deployment footprint from single site to global multi-tenant. Multi-year contracts receive a 15% discount.
Questions your security and compliance team will ask
How is this different from a service mesh like Solo.io or Tetrate?
They route agent traffic and do rate limiting. Daylite generates cryptographic evidence of what those agents did and sits beneath them. Solo.io logs to standard observability stores which are mutable and rejected under Federal Rule of Evidence 901. Daylite creates tamper-evident hash-chain evidence that survives regulator and court scrutiny. We are not a competitor. Daylite deploys as a WASM filter inside their mesh or standalone in environments where no mesh exists.
We already have Vanta, Drata, or OneTrust. Why add another tool?
Those platforms manage compliance workflows and policy documentation. They do not generate runtime cryptographic evidence of agent actions. When a FINMA or DORA examiner asks you to reconstruct exactly what an autonomous agent did on a specific date, Vanta cannot answer. Daylite produces that evidence pack with signed, append-only cryptographic integrity. The two tools complement, they do not overlap.
What does 'built on FIPS-validated cryptography' actually mean?
Daylite uses AWS-LC, which holds NIST CMVP Certificate #4816. Daylite itself is not product-certified under FIPS 140-3. This distinction matters. Commercial enterprise procurement (banks, insurers, law firms, regulated pharma) accepts library-level validation. FedRAMP High and certain DoD contracts require product-level CMVP validation, which is on the post-Series A roadmap. For commercial customers under SOC 2, HIPAA, FINMA, DORA, or EU AI Act, library-level validation is fully sufficient.
How does this work during an actual regulator audit?
When a FINMA, BaFin, or internal auditor arrives on site, your team runs one command: /v1/audit/export/regulatory. It produces a cryptographically signed evidence pack (JSON plus ZIP) aligned with the specific framework (DORA Article 12, HIPAA § 164.312, 21 CFR Part 11, EU AI Act Annex VIII, FINMA 08/2024). The auditor verifies the hash chain offline with our verify tool, confirms no tampering, and signs off. No proprietary format, no vendor lock-in for evidence format.
How does this scale with thousands of agents?
Daylite runs as a central control plane (1 to 3 HA instances, not per-agent). Agents emit events via SDK, proxy mode, or WASM filter to the control plane. Our production target handles 100K events per second of hash-chain append with sub-millisecond latency. Not a sidecar pattern. Customers with 5,000 agents deploy three control plane instances, not 5,000 sidecars.
Can Microsoft Agent 365 or Azure API Management do this?
Microsoft ships generic AI governance across their cloud. Two structural problems. First, their audit stores reside in Azure, exposing Swiss and EU client data to US CLOUD Act and FISA 702 subpoenas, a criminal violation of Swiss Banking Act Article 47. Second, they do not deploy inside air-gapped regulated environments where sovereignty is required. Daylite is the self-hosted alternative for deployments where Microsoft cannot legally or architecturally fit.
Talk to us
60 minutes with the founder. Technical deep-dive on your regulatory requirements, deployment environment, and integration path. A working session, not a sales pitch.
Or reach out directly at hello@daylite.ai